Control of Corruption in Cameroon
Cameroon: Control of Corruption was 0.1651 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption in Cameroon, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
Cameroon recorded 0.1651 standard error for control of corruption in 2011.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.7% on the previous year and down 31.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption in Cameroon peaked at 0.2959 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1533 standard error, in 2006.
Cameroon ranks 34th of 53 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Control of Corruption in Cameroon, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2959 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.1985 standard error | -32.9% |
| 2000 | 0.2425 standard error | +22.2% |
| 2002 | 0.1884 standard error | -22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.1918 standard error | +1.8% |
| 2004 | 0.186 standard error | -3.1% |
| 2005 | 0.1747 standard error | -6.1% |
| 2006 | 0.1533 standard error | -12.2% |
| 2007 | 0.158 standard error | +3.1% |
| 2008 | 0.1572 standard error | -0.5% |
| 2009 | 0.1709 standard error | +8.7% |
| 2010 | 0.1697 standard error | -0.7% |
| 2011 | 0.1651 standard error | -2.7% |
Cameroon compared with similar countries
- Cameroon's 0.1651 standard error is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.1659 standard error, 99% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Cameroon's 0.1651 standard error is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1749 standard error, 94% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2472 standard error | 0.1985 standard error | 0.2959 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1803 standard error | 0.1533 standard error | 0.2425 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1674 standard error | 0.1651 standard error | 0.1697 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Cameroon
More reference data data for Cameroon
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4076 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.199 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 17.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.08 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption in Cameroon?
- Control of corruption in Cameroon was 0.1651 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest control of corruption recorded in Cameroon?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2959 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest control of corruption recorded in Cameroon?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1533 standard error in 2006.
- How does Cameroon rank for control of corruption?
- Cameroon ranks 34th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is control of corruption rising or falling in Cameroon?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cameroon data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.