Control of Corruption in Egypt
Egypt: Control of Corruption was 0.1641 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption in Egypt, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
The most recent figure for control of corruption in Egypt is 0.1641 standard error, measured in 2011.
The figure is down 3.3% on the previous year and down 25.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption in Egypt peaked at 0.2696 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1564 standard error, in 2006.
That places Egypt 35th out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Control of Corruption in Egypt, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2696 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.1829 standard error | -32.2% |
| 2000 | 0.2206 standard error | +20.6% |
| 2002 | 0.1778 standard error | -19.4% |
| 2003 | 0.1918 standard error | +7.9% |
| 2004 | 0.1797 standard error | -6.3% |
| 2005 | 0.1784 standard error | -0.7% |
| 2006 | 0.1564 standard error | -12.3% |
| 2007 | 0.1605 standard error | +2.6% |
| 2008 | 0.1591 standard error | -0.9% |
| 2009 | 0.1722 standard error | +8.3% |
| 2010 | 0.1697 standard error | -1.4% |
| 2011 | 0.1641 standard error | -3.3% |
Egypt compared with similar countries
- Egypt's 0.1641 standard error is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.1659 standard error, 99% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Egypt's 0.1641 standard error is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.1698 standard error, 97% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2262 standard error | 0.1829 standard error | 0.2696 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1774 standard error | 0.1564 standard error | 0.2206 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1669 standard error | 0.1641 standard error | 0.1697 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Egypt
More reference data data for Egypt
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2851 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 16.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.956 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4622 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 71.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 6.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption in Egypt?
- Control of corruption in Egypt was 0.1641 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest control of corruption recorded in Egypt?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2696 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest control of corruption recorded in Egypt?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1564 standard error in 2006.
- How does Egypt rank for control of corruption?
- Egypt ranks 35th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is control of corruption rising or falling in Egypt?
- Over the last ten years it is down 25.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Egypt data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.