Egypt vs Ethiopia: Control of Corruption

Egypt
0.1641 standard error
in 2011
Ethiopia
0.1641 standard error
in 2011
Egypt rank
35th
Ethiopia rank
35th

Control of Corruption over time

  • Egypt
  • Ethiopia
00.10.20.3199620032011

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0.1641 standard error against 0.1641 standard error in Ethiopia, a difference of 0 standard error.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Egypt ranks 35th and Ethiopia ranks 35th of 53 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2262 standard error 0.2472 standard error 0.021 standard error Ethiopia
2000s 0.1774 standard error 0.1797 standard error 0.0023 standard error Ethiopia
2010s 0.1669 standard error 0.1669 standard error 0 standard error

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption, Egypt or Ethiopia?
Egypt, at 0.1641 standard error against 0.1641 standard error in Ethiopia as of 2011.
What is the difference in control of corruption between Egypt and Ethiopia?
0 standard error, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Ethiopia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Egypt and Ethiopia rank globally for control of corruption?
Egypt ranks 35th and Ethiopia ranks 35th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 688 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.