Clientelism Index in Chile
Chile: Clientelism Index was 0.088 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Clientelism Index in Chile, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, clientelism index in Chile stood at 0.088.
That represents a change of down 33.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, clientelism index in Chile peaked at 0.936 in 1822 and was at its lowest, 0.08, in 2022.
That places Chile 157th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Clientelism Index in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.876 | — |
| 1790 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.83 | -5.3% |
| 1811 | 0.819 | -1.3% |
| 1812 | 0.815 | -0.5% |
| 1813 | 0.815 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.853 | +4.7% |
| 1815 | 0.853 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.853 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.853 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.909 | +6.6% |
| 1819 | 0.909 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.909 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.909 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.936 | +3.0% |
| 1823 | 0.838 | -10.5% |
| 1824 | 0.838 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.838 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.838 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.829 | -1.1% |
| 1828 | 0.829 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.829 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.821 | -1.0% |
| 1831 | 0.874 | +6.5% |
| 1832 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.876 | +0.2% |
| 1835 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.884 | +0.9% |
| 1837 | 0.886 | +0.2% |
| 1838 | 0.886 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.886 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.843 | -4.9% |
| 1841 | 0.845 | +0.2% |
| 1842 | 0.846 | +0.1% |
| 1843 | 0.849 | +0.4% |
| 1844 | 0.849 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.849 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.853 | +0.5% |
| 1847 | 0.853 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.797 | -6.6% |
| 1849 | 0.805 | +1.0% |
| 1850 | 0.76 | -5.6% |
| 1851 | 0.765 | +0.7% |
| 1852 | 0.827 | +8.1% |
| 1853 | 0.827 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.827 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.817 | -1.2% |
| 1856 | 0.818 | +0.1% |
| 1857 | 0.819 | +0.1% |
| 1858 | 0.825 | +0.7% |
| 1859 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.78 | -5.5% |
| 1861 | 0.759 | -2.7% |
| 1862 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.766 | +0.9% |
| 1865 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.77 | +0.5% |
| 1867 | 0.772 | +0.3% |
| 1868 | 0.772 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.772 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.771 | -0.1% |
| 1871 | 0.761 | -1.3% |
| 1872 | 0.753 | -1.1% |
| 1873 | 0.763 | +1.3% |
| 1874 | 0.705 | -7.6% |
| 1875 | 0.705 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.694 | -1.6% |
| 1877 | 0.694 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.694 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.691 | -0.4% |
| 1880 | 0.66 | -4.5% |
| 1881 | 0.659 | -0.2% |
| 1882 | 0.657 | -0.3% |
| 1883 | 0.657 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.622 | -5.3% |
| 1885 | 0.618 | -0.6% |
| 1886 | 0.611 | -1.1% |
| 1887 | 0.605 | -1.0% |
| 1888 | 0.608 | +0.5% |
| 1889 | 0.608 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.608 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.559 | -8.1% |
| 1892 | 0.601 | +7.5% |
| 1893 | 0.601 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.602 | +0.2% |
| 1895 | 0.602 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.605 | +0.5% |
| 1897 | 0.607 | +0.3% |
| 1898 | 0.607 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.607 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.688 | +13.3% |
| 1901 | 0.69 | +0.3% |
| 1902 | 0.691 | +0.1% |
| 1903 | 0.723 | +4.6% |
| 1904 | 0.729 | +0.8% |
| 1905 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.692 | -5.1% |
| 1907 | 0.684 | -1.2% |
| 1908 | 0.684 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.719 | +5.1% |
| 1910 | 0.727 | +1.1% |
| 1911 | 0.727 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.729 | +0.3% |
| 1913 | 0.73 | +0.1% |
| 1914 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.688 | -5.8% |
| 1916 | 0.678 | -1.5% |
| 1917 | 0.678 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.715 | +5.5% |
| 1919 | 0.723 | +1.1% |
| 1920 | 0.634 | -12.3% |
| 1921 | 0.618 | -2.5% |
| 1922 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.637 | +3.1% |
| 1925 | 0.638 | +0.2% |
| 1926 | 0.437 | -31.5% |
| 1927 | 0.571 | +30.7% |
| 1928 | 0.655 | +14.7% |
| 1929 | 0.655 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.655 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.599 | -8.5% |
| 1932 | 0.464 | -22.5% |
| 1933 | 0.647 | +39.4% |
| 1934 | 0.669 | +3.4% |
| 1935 | 0.669 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.669 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.59 | -11.8% |
| 1938 | 0.558 | -5.4% |
| 1939 | 0.485 | -13.1% |
| 1940 | 0.485 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.462 | -4.7% |
| 1942 | 0.457 | -1.1% |
| 1943 | 0.457 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.457 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.472 | +3.3% |
| 1946 | 0.474 | +0.4% |
| 1947 | 0.472 | -0.4% |
| 1948 | 0.472 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.466 | -1.3% |
| 1950 | 0.464 | -0.4% |
| 1951 | 0.464 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.471 | +1.5% |
| 1953 | 0.486 | +3.2% |
| 1954 | 0.486 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.486 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.486 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.465 | -4.3% |
| 1958 | 0.436 | -6.2% |
| 1959 | 0.376 | -13.8% |
| 1960 | 0.376 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.365 | -2.9% |
| 1962 | 0.363 | -0.5% |
| 1963 | 0.345 | -5.0% |
| 1964 | 0.341 | -1.2% |
| 1965 | 0.329 | -3.5% |
| 1966 | 0.329 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.329 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.329 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.325 | -1.2% |
| 1970 | 0.33 | +1.5% |
| 1971 | 0.343 | +3.9% |
| 1972 | 0.343 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.289 | -15.7% |
| 1974 | 0.308 | +6.6% |
| 1975 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.308 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.243 | -21.1% |
| 1990 | 0.203 | -16.5% |
| 1991 | 0.203 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.203 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.2 | -1.5% |
| 1994 | 0.144 | -28.0% |
| 1995 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.143 | -0.7% |
| 1998 | 0.133 | -7.0% |
| 1999 | 0.133 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.127 | -4.5% |
| 2001 | 0.127 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.124 | -2.4% |
| 2003 | 0.124 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.124 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.124 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.119 | -4.0% |
| 2007 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.12 | +0.8% |
| 2010 | 0.107 | -10.8% |
| 2011 | 0.106 | -0.9% |
| 2012 | 0.118 | +11.3% |
| 2013 | 0.127 | +7.6% |
| 2014 | 0.132 | +3.9% |
| 2015 | 0.132 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.125 | -5.3% |
| 2017 | 0.122 | -2.4% |
| 2018 | 0.088 | -27.9% |
| 2019 | 0.088 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.088 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.099 | +12.5% |
| 2022 | 0.08 | -19.2% |
| 2023 | 0.086 | +7.5% |
| 2024 | 0.088 | +2.3% |
| 2025 | 0.088 | +0.0% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 0.088 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.131, 67% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Chile's 0.088 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.514, 17% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Clientelism Index in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1933 | +39.4% | 0.464 | 0.647 |
| 1926 | -31.5% | 0.638 | 0.437 |
| 1927 | +30.7% | 0.437 | 0.571 |
| 1994 | -28.0% | 0.2 | 0.144 |
| 2018 | -27.9% | 0.122 | 0.088 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.876 | 0.876 | 0.876 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.876 | 0.876 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.876 | 0.876 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.8509 | 0.815 | 0.909 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.8593 | 0.829 | 0.936 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.8737 | 0.821 | 0.886 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.8389 | 0.797 | 0.853 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.811 | 0.76 | 0.827 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.7675 | 0.759 | 0.78 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.7231 | 0.691 | 0.771 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.6305 | 0.605 | 0.66 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.5999 | 0.559 | 0.608 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.7029 | 0.684 | 0.729 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.7125 | 0.678 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.6081 | 0.437 | 0.655 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.6005 | 0.464 | 0.669 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.4674 | 0.457 | 0.485 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.462 | 0.376 | 0.486 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.3431 | 0.325 | 0.376 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.3153 | 0.289 | 0.343 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3015 | 0.243 | 0.308 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.165 | 0.133 | 0.203 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1227 | 0.119 | 0.127 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1145 | 0.088 | 0.132 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0882 | 0.08 | 0.099 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is clientelism index in Chile?
- Clientelism index in Chile was 0.088 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest clientelism index recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.936 in 1822.
- What is the lowest clientelism index recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.08 in 2022.
- How does Chile rank for clientelism index?
- Chile ranks 157th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is clientelism index rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Clientelism Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.