Clientelism Index in Uruguay
Uruguay: Clientelism Index was 0.085 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Clientelism Index in Uruguay, 1830–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, clientelism index in Uruguay stood at 0.085.
That represents a change of down 26.1% on the previous year and up 203.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, clientelism index in Uruguay peaked at 0.835 in 1834 and was at its lowest, 0.028, in 2015.
That places Uruguay 159th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Clientelism Index in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1830 | 0.816 | — |
| 1831 | 0.816 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.816 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.818 | +0.2% |
| 1834 | 0.835 | +2.1% |
| 1835 | 0.835 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.834 | -0.1% |
| 1837 | 0.82 | -1.7% |
| 1838 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.812 | -1.0% |
| 1840 | 0.812 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.815 | +0.4% |
| 1842 | 0.818 | +0.4% |
| 1843 | 0.828 | +1.2% |
| 1844 | 0.828 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.828 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.828 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.828 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.828 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.828 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.828 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.819 | -1.1% |
| 1852 | 0.651 | -20.5% |
| 1853 | 0.651 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.663 | +1.8% |
| 1855 | 0.664 | +0.2% |
| 1856 | 0.664 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.663 | -0.2% |
| 1858 | 0.654 | -1.4% |
| 1859 | 0.654 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.376 | -42.5% |
| 1861 | 0.39 | +3.7% |
| 1862 | 0.39 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.39 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.39 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.635 | +62.8% |
| 1866 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.636 | +0.2% |
| 1868 | 0.562 | -11.6% |
| 1869 | 0.562 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.562 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.562 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.55 | -2.1% |
| 1873 | 0.443 | -19.5% |
| 1874 | 0.443 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.443 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.406 | -8.4% |
| 1877 | 0.404 | -0.5% |
| 1878 | 0.406 | +0.5% |
| 1879 | 0.421 | +3.7% |
| 1880 | 0.384 | -8.8% |
| 1881 | 0.386 | +0.5% |
| 1882 | 0.403 | +4.4% |
| 1883 | 0.403 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.4 | -0.7% |
| 1885 | 0.375 | -6.3% |
| 1886 | 0.375 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.377 | +0.5% |
| 1888 | 0.394 | +4.5% |
| 1889 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.392 | -0.5% |
| 1894 | 0.374 | -4.6% |
| 1895 | 0.374 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.376 | +0.5% |
| 1897 | 0.396 | +5.3% |
| 1898 | 0.397 | +0.3% |
| 1899 | 0.405 | +2.0% |
| 1900 | 0.405 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.41 | +1.2% |
| 1902 | 0.456 | +11.2% |
| 1903 | 0.456 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.461 | +1.1% |
| 1905 | 0.468 | +1.5% |
| 1906 | 0.469 | +0.2% |
| 1907 | 0.476 | +1.5% |
| 1908 | 0.537 | +12.8% |
| 1909 | 0.537 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.529 | -1.5% |
| 1911 | 0.45 | -14.9% |
| 1912 | 0.45 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.455 | +1.1% |
| 1914 | 0.515 | +13.2% |
| 1915 | 0.515 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.481 | -6.6% |
| 1917 | 0.292 | -39.3% |
| 1918 | 0.29 | -0.7% |
| 1919 | 0.291 | +0.3% |
| 1920 | 0.312 | +7.2% |
| 1921 | 0.481 | +54.2% |
| 1922 | 0.479 | -0.4% |
| 1923 | 0.459 | -4.2% |
| 1924 | 0.459 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.459 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.46 | +0.2% |
| 1927 | 0.46 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.46 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.456 | -0.9% |
| 1930 | 0.457 | +0.2% |
| 1931 | 0.467 | +2.2% |
| 1932 | 0.467 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.464 | -0.6% |
| 1934 | 0.46 | -0.9% |
| 1935 | 0.46 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.46 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.46 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.459 | -0.2% |
| 1939 | 0.459 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.459 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.459 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.459 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.465 | +1.3% |
| 1944 | 0.465 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.465 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.459 | -1.3% |
| 1947 | 0.406 | -11.5% |
| 1948 | 0.406 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.406 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.406 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.401 | -1.2% |
| 1952 | 0.401 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.401 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.398 | -0.7% |
| 1955 | 0.379 | -4.8% |
| 1956 | 0.379 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.379 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.38 | +0.3% |
| 1959 | 0.394 | +3.7% |
| 1960 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.393 | -0.3% |
| 1963 | 0.389 | -1.0% |
| 1964 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.39 | +0.3% |
| 1967 | 0.322 | -17.4% |
| 1968 | 0.322 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.353 | +9.6% |
| 1970 | 0.311 | -11.9% |
| 1971 | 0.311 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.308 | -1.0% |
| 1973 | 0.365 | +18.5% |
| 1974 | 0.365 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.365 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.365 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.365 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.365 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.365 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.365 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.365 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.365 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.365 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.348 | -4.7% |
| 1985 | 0.126 | -63.8% |
| 1986 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.12 | -4.8% |
| 1989 | 0.12 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.111 | -7.5% |
| 1991 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.11 | -0.9% |
| 1995 | 0.096 | -12.7% |
| 1996 | 0.065 | -32.3% |
| 1997 | 0.065 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.065 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.065 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.064 | -1.5% |
| 2001 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.066 | +3.1% |
| 2005 | 0.048 | -27.3% |
| 2006 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.046 | -4.2% |
| 2010 | 0.037 | -19.6% |
| 2011 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.04 | +8.1% |
| 2015 | 0.028 | -30.0% |
| 2016 | 0.028 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.028 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.028 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.042 | +50.0% |
| 2020 | 0.095 | +126.2% |
| 2021 | 0.095 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.121 | +27.4% |
| 2023 | 0.121 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.115 | -5.0% |
| 2025 | 0.085 | -26.1% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 0.085 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.131, 65% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 0.085 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.514, 17% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Clientelism Index in Uruguay changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | +126.2% | 0.042 | 0.095 |
| 1985 | -63.8% | 0.348 | 0.126 |
| 1865 | +62.8% | 0.39 | 0.635 |
| 1921 | +54.2% | 0.312 | 0.481 |
| 2019 | +50.0% | 0.028 | 0.042 |
| 1860 | -42.5% | 0.654 | 0.376 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0.8222 | 0.812 | 0.835 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.8241 | 0.812 | 0.828 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.6911 | 0.651 | 0.828 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.4966 | 0.376 | 0.636 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.464 | 0.404 | 0.562 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.3891 | 0.375 | 0.403 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.3896 | 0.374 | 0.405 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.4675 | 0.405 | 0.537 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.4268 | 0.29 | 0.529 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.4485 | 0.312 | 0.481 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.4613 | 0.457 | 0.467 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.4449 | 0.406 | 0.465 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.3918 | 0.379 | 0.406 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.3735 | 0.322 | 0.394 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.3485 | 0.308 | 0.365 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2426 | 0.12 | 0.365 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.091 | 0.065 | 0.111 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.056 | 0.046 | 0.066 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0342 | 0.028 | 0.042 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1053 | 0.085 | 0.121 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More reference data data for Uruguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is clientelism index in Uruguay?
- Clientelism index in Uruguay was 0.085 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest clientelism index recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 0.835 in 1834.
- What is the lowest clientelism index recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.028 in 2015.
- How does Uruguay rank for clientelism index?
- Uruguay ranks 159th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is clientelism index rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 203.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Clientelism Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 196 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.