Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia

Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 19.2% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
19.2%
Change on year
down 5.0%
World rank
27th
of 35 countries
All-time high
20.7%
in 2007
All-time low
12.1%
in 2010
Years of data
9
2007–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia, 2007–2020

051015202007201320202007: 20.72009: 18.62010: 12.12011: 13.62012: 19.82014: 19.32016: 19.72018: 20.22020: 19.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Mongolia recorded 19.2% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in 2020.

That represents a change of down 5.0% on the previous year and up 58.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mongolia peaked at 20.7% in 2007 and was at its lowest, 12.1%, in 2010.

That places Mongolia 27th out of 35 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Mongolia, 2007 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2007 20.7%
2009 18.6% -10.3%
2010 12.1% -34.7%
2011 13.6% +12.4%
2012 19.8% +45.4%
2014 19.3% -2.8%
2016 19.7% +2.2%
2018 20.2% +2.6%
2020 19.2% -5.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 19.6% 18.6% 20.7% 2
2010s 17.5% 12.1% 20.2% 6
2020s 19.2% 19.2% 19.2% 1

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 24 Panama 20.2% compare
  2. 25 Türkiye 20.0% compare
  3. 26 Kazakhstan 19.9% compare
  4. 28 Peru 18.1% compare
  5. 29 Georgia 17.4% compare
  6. 30 Uruguay 14.3% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mongolia?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Mongolia was 19.2% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 20.7% in 2007.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 12.1% in 2010.
How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Mongolia ranks 27th out of 35 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is up 58.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/mongolia/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group