Mongolia vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Mongolia
19.2%
in 2020
Peru
18.1%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
27th
Peru rank
28th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 19.2% against 18.1% in Peru, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Peru ahead.
Mongolia ranks 27th and Peru ranks 28th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.6% | 24.1% | 5.6% | Peru |
| 2010s | 17.5% | 12.1% | 5.4% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 19.2% | 14.0% | 5.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 19.2% against 18.1% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Mongolia and Peru?
- 1.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Mongolia ranks 27th and Peru ranks 28th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group