Mongolia vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Mongolia
19.2%
in 2020
Panama
20.2%
in 2023
Mongolia rank
27th
Panama rank
24th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Mongolia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 20.2% against 19.2% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Panama ahead.
Mongolia ranks 27th and Panama ranks 24th of 35 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.6% | 24.6% | 6.0% | Panama |
| 2010s | 17.5% | 20.0% | 2.5% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Mongolia or Panama?
- Panama, at 20.2% against 19.2% in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Mongolia and Panama?
- 1.0%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Panama?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Mongolia and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Mongolia ranks 27th and Panama ranks 24th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group