Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Türkiye

Türkiye: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 20.0% in 2013. ▼ Falling

Latest (2013)
20.0%
Change on year
down 24.1%
World rank
25th
of 35 countries
All-time high
34.3%
in 2004
All-time low
20.0%
in 2013
Years of data
10
2004–2013

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Türkiye, 2004–2013

01020302004200820132004: 34.32005: 30.92006: 25.22007: 29.62008: 34.12009: 28.92010: 31.42011: 24.62012: 26.32013: 20

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Türkiye recorded 20.0% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.

That represents a change of down 24.1% on the previous year and down 41.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Türkiye peaked at 34.3% in 2004 and was at its lowest, 20.0%, in 2013.

Türkiye ranks 25th of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Türkiye, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Türkiye, 2004 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2004 34.3%
2005 30.9% -9.8%
2006 25.2% -18.4%
2007 29.6% +17.3%
2008 34.1% +15.1%
2009 28.9% -15.4%
2010 31.4% +8.9%
2011 24.6% -21.7%
2012 26.3% +7.0%
2013 20.0% -24.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 30.5% 25.2% 34.3% 6
2010s 25.6% 20.0% 31.4% 4

Countries ranked near Türkiye

  1. 22 Chile 23.0%
  2. 23 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 21.6% compare
  3. 24 Panama 20.2% compare
  4. 26 Kazakhstan 19.9%
  5. 27 Mongolia 19.2% compare
  6. 28 Peru 18.1% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Türkiye

All data for Türkiye →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Türkiye?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Türkiye was 20.0% in 2013, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Türkiye?
The highest recorded value was 34.3% in 2004.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Türkiye?
The lowest recorded value was 20.0% in 2013.
How does Türkiye rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Türkiye ranks 25th out of 35 countries with data for 2013.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Türkiye?
Over the last ten years it is down 41.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Türkiye data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Türkiye. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/turkiye/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Türkiye</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group