Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Mongolia
19.2%
in 2020
Uruguay
14.3%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
27th
Uruguay rank
30th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 19.2% against 14.3% in Uruguay, a difference of 4.9%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Uruguay ahead.
Mongolia ranks 27th and Uruguay ranks 30th of 35 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.6% | 20.8% | 2.3% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 17.1% | 29.2% | 12.1% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 19.2% | 20.4% | 1.2% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Mongolia, at 19.2% against 14.3% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 4.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Mongolia ranks 27th and Uruguay ranks 30th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group