Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Ecuador

Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 13.4% in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
13.4%
Change on year
up 41.6%
World rank
31st
of 35 countries
All-time high
43.8%
in 2011
All-time low
9.5%
in 2021
Years of data
13
2008–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Ecuador, 2008–2022

102030402008201520222008: 34.12010: 33.62011: 43.82012: 39.32014: 252015: 12.22016: 17.32017: 13.22018: 15.32019: 14.62020: 11.12021: 9.52022: 13.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Ecuador stood at 13.4%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 41.6% on the previous year and down 65.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Ecuador peaked at 43.8% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 9.5%, in 2021.

Ecuador ranks 31st of 35 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Ecuador, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 34.1%
2010 33.6% -1.7%
2011 43.8% +30.6%
2012 39.3% -10.4%
2014 25.0% -36.3%
2015 12.2% -51.4%
2016 17.3% +42.6%
2017 13.2% -23.7%
2018 15.3% +15.8%
2019 14.6% -4.9%
2020 11.1% -23.7%
2021 9.5% -14.7%
2022 13.4% +41.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 34.1% 34.1% 34.1% 1
2010s 23.8% 12.2% 43.8% 9
2020s 11.4% 9.5% 13.4% 3

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 28 Peru 18.1% compare
  2. 29 Georgia 17.4% compare
  3. 30 Uruguay 14.3% compare
  4. 32 Côte d'Ivoire 13.0% compare
  5. 33 Belarus 12.3% compare
  6. 34 Burkina Faso 9.7% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Ecuador?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Ecuador was 13.4% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 43.8% in 2011.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 9.5% in 2021.
How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Ecuador ranks 31st out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 65.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/ecuador/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group