Belarus vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Belarus
12.3%
in 2019
Ecuador
13.4%
in 2022
Belarus rank
33rd
Ecuador rank
31st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 13.4% against 12.3% in Belarus, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Belarus ranks 33rd and Ecuador ranks 31st of 35 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.9% | 34.1% | 23.3% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 13.8% | 21.3% | 7.5% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 13.4% against 12.3% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 1.1%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 33rd and Ecuador ranks 31st of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group