Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 12.3% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus is 12.3%, measured in 2019.
The figure is down 1.5% on the previous year and down 3.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus peaked at 20.6% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 10.8%, in 2010.
That places Belarus 33rd out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 10.9% | — |
| 2009 | 12.7% | +16.7% |
| 2010 | 10.8% | -14.8% |
| 2012 | 20.4% | +88.1% |
| 2013 | 20.6% | +1.2% |
| 2014 | 17.1% | -17.2% |
| 2015 | 12.8% | -24.9% |
| 2016 | 12.9% | +0.3% |
| 2017 | 12.1% | -6.3% |
| 2018 | 12.4% | +3.2% |
| 2019 | 12.3% | -1.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.8% | 10.9% | 12.7% | 2 |
| 2010s | 14.6% | 10.8% | 20.6% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 30 Uruguay 14.3% compare
- 31 Ecuador 13.4% compare
- 32 Côte d'Ivoire 13.0% compare
- 34 Burkina Faso 9.7% compare
- 35 Malawi 9.0% compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus was 12.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 20.6% in 2013.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.8% in 2010.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 33rd out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group