Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Côte d'Ivoire

Côte d'Ivoire: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 13.0% in 2021. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2021)
13.0%
Change on year
up 147.5%
World rank
32nd
of 35 countries
All-time high
35.0%
in 2015
All-time low
5.2%
in 2018
Years of data
5
2002–2021

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Côte d'Ivoire, 2002–2021

102030402002201120212002: 28.92008: 18.92015: 352018: 5.22021: 13

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2021, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Côte d'Ivoire stood at 13.0%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 147.5% on the previous year and down 31.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Côte d'Ivoire peaked at 35.0% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 5.2%, in 2018.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 32nd of 35 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Côte d'Ivoire, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Côte d'Ivoire, 2002 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2002 28.9%
2008 18.9% -34.6%
2015 35.0% +85.1%
2018 5.2% -85.0%
2021 13.0% +147.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 23.9% 18.9% 28.9% 2
2010s 20.1% 5.2% 35.0% 2
2020s 13.0% 13.0% 13.0% 1

Countries ranked near Côte d'Ivoire

  1. 29 Georgia 17.4% compare
  2. 30 Uruguay 14.3% compare
  3. 31 Ecuador 13.4% compare
  4. 33 Belarus 12.3% compare
  5. 34 Burkina Faso 9.7% compare
  6. 35 Malawi 9.0% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Côte d'Ivoire

All data for Côte d'Ivoire →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Côte d'Ivoire?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Côte d'Ivoire was 13.0% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Côte d'Ivoire?
The highest recorded value was 35.0% in 2015.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Côte d'Ivoire?
The lowest recorded value was 5.2% in 2018.
How does Côte d'Ivoire rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 32nd out of 35 countries with data for 2021.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Côte d'Ivoire?
Over the last ten years it is down 31.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Côte d'Ivoire data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Côte d'Ivoire. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/cote-d-ivoire/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Côte d'Ivoire</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group