Ecuador vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Ecuador
13.4%
in 2022
Peru
18.1%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
31st
Peru rank
28th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Ecuador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 18.1% against 13.4% in Ecuador, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 31st and Peru ranks 28th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.1% | 12.0% | 22.2% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 23.8% | 13.1% | 10.8% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 11.4% | 16.0% | 4.6% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Ecuador or Peru?
- Peru, at 18.1% against 13.4% in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Ecuador and Peru?
- 4.7%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Ecuador ranks 31st and Peru ranks 28th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group