Belarus vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Belarus
12.3%
in 2019
Uruguay
14.3%
in 2022
Belarus rank
33rd
Uruguay rank
30th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 14.3% against 12.3% in Belarus, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Uruguay ahead.
Belarus ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 30th of 35 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.8% | 19.1% | 7.3% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 13.4% | 23.5% | 10.1% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 14.3% against 12.3% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 2.0%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 30th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group