Central African Republic vs Guinea: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Central African Republic
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.1361 standard error against 0.1336 standard error in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0025 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 16th and Guinea ranks 14th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.298 standard error | 0.2523 standard error | 0.0457 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.1768 standard error | 0.1667 standard error | 0.0101 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1334 standard error | 0.1363 standard error | 0.003 standard error | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Central African Republic or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 0.1361 standard error against 0.1336 standard error in Central African Republic as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Central African Republic and Guinea?
- 0.0025 standard error, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Guinea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Guinea rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Central African Republic ranks 16th and Guinea ranks 14th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.