Gabon vs Rwanda: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Gabon
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports -0.7616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Gabon, a difference of 0.0647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 147th and Rwanda ranks 144th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.7821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Gabon |
| 2000s | -0.8496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Gabon |
| 2010s | -0.875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9569 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Gabon |
| 2020s | -0.9687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7478 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2209 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Gabon or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at -0.7616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Gabon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Gabon and Rwanda?
- 0.0647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Rwanda?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Rwanda rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Gabon ranks 147th and Rwanda ranks 144th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.