Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Poland
Poland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was 0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Poland, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Poland stood at 0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is up 83.4% on the previous year and down 29.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Poland peaked at 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0.3694 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2021.
Poland ranks 56th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8738 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.8895 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4789 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3694 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 53 South Korea 0.8078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 54 Cape Verde 0.7911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 55 Greece 0.7819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 57 New Caledonia 0.7309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 58 Croatia 0.6487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 59 Seychelles 0.6344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Poland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.499 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8896 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 8.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.84 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Poland?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Poland was 0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3694 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2021.
- How does Poland rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Poland ranks 56th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 29.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.