Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Poland
Poland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Poland, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Poland stood at 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is up 5.9% on the previous year and down 17.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Poland peaked at 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.3927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2021.
Poland ranks 53rd of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Poland, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.9594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.9616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2000 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.0% |
| 2002 | 0.9797 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.5% |
| 2003 | 0.9854 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2004 | 0.8526 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.5% |
| 2005 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.0% |
| 2006 | 0.843 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.9% |
| 2007 | 0.8492 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2008 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +22.6% |
| 2009 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9% |
| 2010 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.8% |
| 2011 | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.5% |
| 2012 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.5% |
| 2013 | 0.9595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.9% |
| 2014 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.5% |
| 2015 | 0.9924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.5% |
| 2016 | 0.8516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.2% |
| 2017 | 0.6837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.7% |
| 2018 | 0.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.6% |
| 2019 | 0.5881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2020 | 0.5194 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.7% |
| 2021 | 0.3927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.4% |
| 2022 | 0.4009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.1% |
| 2023 | 0.4413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.1% |
| 2024 | 0.773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +75.2% |
| 2025 | 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.9% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 80% of the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Poland's 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 93% of the median. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.9606 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.843 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.8949 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 50 South Korea 0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 51 Greece 0.8623 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 52 Slovakia 0.848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 54 United States Virgin Islands 0.8093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 55 Tonga 0.8058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 56 Andorra 0.7936 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Poland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.499 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8896 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 8.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.84 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Poland?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Poland was 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2010.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2021.
- How does Poland rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Poland ranks 53rd out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 17.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.