South Korea vs Poland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

South Korea
0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Poland
0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
South Korea rank
50th
Poland rank
53rd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • South Korea
  • Poland
0.40.60.811.2199620102025

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Poland, a difference of 0.0569 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Poland ahead.

South Korea ranks 50th and Poland ranks 53rd of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3566 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Poland
2000s 0.8084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9606 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Poland
2010s 0.8284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8949 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Poland
2020s 0.8738 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3161 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, South Korea or Poland?
South Korea, at 0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Poland as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between South Korea and Poland?
0.0569 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Poland?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do South Korea and Poland rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
South Korea ranks 50th and Poland ranks 53rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Poland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/korea-rep/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/korea-rep/poland/">South Korea vs Poland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.