Andorra vs Poland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Andorra
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7936 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Andorra, a difference of 0.0251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Andorra ahead.
Andorra ranks 56th and Poland ranks 53rd of 208 countries.
Andorra has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Andorra | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Andorra |
| 2000s | 1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9606 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Andorra |
| 2010s | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8949 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Andorra |
| 2020s | 0.8502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Andorra |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Andorra or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7936 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Andorra as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Andorra and Poland?
- 0.0251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Poland?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Andorra and Poland rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Andorra ranks 56th and Poland ranks 53rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.