Poland vs United States Virgin Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Poland
0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
United States Virgin Islands
0.8093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2017
Poland rank
53rd
United States Virgin Islands rank
54th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Poland
  • United States Virgin Islands
00.250.50.751199620102025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in United States Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.0094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 53rd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 54th of 208 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0.9387 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1515 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Poland
2010s 0.9739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Poland or United States Virgin Islands?
Poland, at 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in United States Virgin Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Poland and United States Virgin Islands?
0.0094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and United States Virgin Islands?
14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
How do Poland and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Poland ranks 53rd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 54th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs United States Virgin Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/poland/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/poland/virgin-islands-u-s/">Poland vs United States Virgin Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.