Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea is -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 1.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea peaked at -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2017 and was at its lowest, -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1998.
That places Equatorial Guinea 197th out of 206 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 1.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 13.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0358 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 10.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 14.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 0.9434 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 0.0337 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0083 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea was -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2017.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 197th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.