Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea is -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
The figure is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 2.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea peaked at -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019 and was at its lowest, -1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1998.
That places Equatorial Guinea 201st out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2000 | -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.1% |
| 2002 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.8% |
| 2003 | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.1% |
| 2004 | -1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2005 | -1.81 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2006 | -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9% |
| 2007 | -1.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.5% |
| 2008 | -1.9 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2009 | -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.5% |
| 2010 | -1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.5% |
| 2011 | -1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2012 | -1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2013 | -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.9% |
| 2014 | -1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.3% |
| 2015 | -1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2016 | -1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2017 | -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6% |
| 2018 | -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2019 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.0% |
| 2020 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2021 | -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2022 | -1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2023 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
| 2024 | -1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2025 | -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 33.1× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.9016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 2.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
- 198 Venezuela -1.75 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 199 Tajikistan -1.75 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 200 Nicaragua -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 202 South Sudan -1.87 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 203 Sudan -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 204 Turkmenistan -2.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0013 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0316 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0402 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0358 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 1.11 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea was -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 201st out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.