Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Sudan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
-1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sudan
-1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
197th
Sudan rank
200th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
  • Sudan
-2-1.8-1.6-1.4199620102024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sudan, a difference of 0.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 197th and Sudan ranks 200th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Sudan Difference Ahead
1990s -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2000s -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sudan
2010s -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0312 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2020s -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0693 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Sudan?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Sudan?
0.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Sudan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Sudan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 197th and Sudan ranks 200th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Sudan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/equatorial-guinea/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/equatorial-guinea/sudan/">Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Sudan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.