Bermuda vs Chile: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Bermuda
- Chile
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile, a difference of 0.0658 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Bermuda's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bermuda ahead.
Bermuda ranks 33rd and Chile ranks 36th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bermuda |
| 2000s | 0.9928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Chile |
| 2010s | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bermuda or Chile?
- Bermuda, at 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile as of 2017.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bermuda and Chile?
- 0.0658 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Chile?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2017.
- How do Bermuda and Chile rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Bermuda ranks 33rd and Chile ranks 36th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.