Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Central African Republic
Central African Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Central African Republic, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Central African Republic stood at -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of down 0.6% on the previous year and down 19.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Central African Republic peaked at -0.8496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000 and was at its lowest, -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2003.
Central African Republic ranks 174th of 208 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Central African Republic, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.9343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.8689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.0% |
| 2000 | -0.8496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2002 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +35.1% |
| 2003 | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +26.6% |
| 2004 | -0.9986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -31.3% |
| 2005 | -0.9485 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.0% |
| 2006 | -0.9538 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2007 | -0.9501 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2008 | -0.9099 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.2% |
| 2009 | -0.9341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
| 2010 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.6% |
| 2011 | -0.962 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.2% |
| 2012 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.1% |
| 2013 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.3% |
| 2014 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.0% |
| 2015 | -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2016 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.2% |
| 2017 | -0.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7% |
| 2018 | -0.915 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.6% |
| 2019 | -0.9773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.8% |
| 2020 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.4% |
| 2021 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.7% |
| 2022 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
| 2023 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.9% |
| 2024 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.0% |
| 2025 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
Central African Republic compared with similar countries
- Central African Republic's -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for low income countries, which is -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Central African Republic's -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.9016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.9016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.915 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Central African Republic
More reference data data for Central African Republic
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1959 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0271 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6569 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.7203 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1476 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Central African Republic?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Central African Republic was -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Central African Republic?
- The highest recorded value was -0.8496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Central African Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- How does Central African Republic rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Central African Republic ranks 174th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Central African Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Central African Republic data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.