Central African Republic vs Congo: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Central African Republic
-1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Congo
-1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
176th
Congo rank
177th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Congo
-1.6-1.4-1.2-1199620102024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Congo, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Congo ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 176th and Congo ranks 177th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Congo Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2000s -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2010s -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2020s -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Central African Republic or Congo?
Central African Republic, at -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Central African Republic and Congo?
0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Congo?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Congo rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Central African Republic ranks 176th and Congo ranks 177th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Congo: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/congo-rep/">Central African Republic vs Congo: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.