Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import was 90.32 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) in Dominican Republic, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) in Dominican Republic is 90.32, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of up 14.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) in Dominican Republic peaked at 90.32 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 79.03, in 2005.
Dominican Republic ranks 30th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 79.03 | — |
| 2006 | 79.03 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 85.48 | +8.2% |
| 2008 | 90.32 | +5.7% |
| 2009 | 90.32 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 90.32 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 90.32 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 90.32 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 90.32 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 90.32 | +0.0% |
Dominican Republic compared with similar countries
- Dominican Republic's 90.32 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 75.81, 1.2× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Dominican Republic's 90.32 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 81.45, 1.1× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.84 | 79.03 | 90.32 | 5 |
| 2010s | 90.32 | 90.32 | 90.32 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
More reference data data for Dominican Republic
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7575 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0601 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9595 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3273 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) in Dominican Republic?
- Trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) in Dominican Republic was 90.32 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 90.32 in 2008.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 79.03 in 2005.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 30th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.