Dominican Republic vs Chinese Taipei: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Dominican Republic
90.32
in 2014
Chinese Taipei
90.32
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
30th
Chinese Taipei rank
30th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 90.32 against 90.32 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Chinese Taipei ranks 30th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Chinese Taipei in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.84 | 87.1 | 2.26 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 90.32 | 89.03 | 1.29 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Dominican Republic or Chinese Taipei?
- Dominican Republic, at 90.32 against 90.32 in Chinese Taipei as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Dominican Republic and Chinese Taipei?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Chinese Taipei?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Chinese Taipei rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Chinese Taipei ranks 30th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.