Dominican Republic vs Israel: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Dominican Republic
90.32
in 2014
Israel
90.32
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
30th
Israel rank
30th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Israel
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 90.32 against 90.32 in Israel, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Israel ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Israel ranks 30th of 183 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.84 | 87.1 | 2.26 | Israel |
| 2010s | 90.32 | 90.32 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Dominican Republic or Israel?
- Dominican Republic, at 90.32 against 90.32 in Israel as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Dominican Republic and Israel?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Israel?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Israel rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Israel ranks 30th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.