Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) in Georgia
Georgia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) was 90.32 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) in Georgia, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) in Georgia stood at 90.32. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 300.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) in Georgia peaked at 90.32 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 22.58, in 2005.
That places Georgia 30th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top quarter.
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) in Georgia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 22.58 | — |
| 2006 | 83.87 | +271.4% |
| 2007 | 83.87 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 83.87 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 88.71 | +5.8% |
| 2010 | 88.71 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 88.71 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 90.32 | +1.8% |
| 2013 | 90.32 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 90.32 | +0.0% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 90.32 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 75.81, 1.2× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 90.32 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 84.68, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.58 | 22.58 | 88.71 | 5 |
| 2010s | 89.68 | 88.71 | 90.32 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 30 Canada 90.32 compare
- 30 Dominican Republic 90.32 compare
- 30 El Salvador 90.32 compare
- 30 Israel 90.32 compare
- 30 Taiwan 90.32 compare
More reference data data for Georgia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.097 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.684 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0278 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3252 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2904 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1515 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) in Georgia?
- Trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) in Georgia was 90.32 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 90.32 in 2012.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 22.58 in 2005.
- How does Georgia rank for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Georgia ranks 30th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 300.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.