Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Georgia
Georgia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 78.22 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Georgia, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Georgia stood at 78.22.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.3% on the previous year and up 29.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Georgia peaked at 80.49 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 60.43, in 2005.
That places Georgia 115th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Georgia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 60.43 | — |
| 2006 | 71.03 | +17.5% |
| 2007 | 73.81 | +3.9% |
| 2008 | 75.9 | +2.8% |
| 2009 | 80.49 | +6.0% |
| 2010 | 78.55 | -2.4% |
| 2011 | 72.93 | -7.1% |
| 2012 | 78.05 | +7.0% |
| 2013 | 78.42 | +0.5% |
| 2014 | 78.22 | -0.3% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 78.22 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 79.55, 98% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 78.22 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 84.79, 92% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.33 | 60.43 | 80.49 | 5 |
| 2010s | 77.23 | 72.93 | 78.55 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 112 Yemen 78.84 compare
- 113 Sierra Leone 78.57 compare
- 114 Belize 78.49 compare
- 116 Dominica 78.13 compare
- 116 Equatorial Guinea 78.13 compare
- 116 Mozambique 78.13 compare
More reference data data for Georgia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.097 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.684 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0278 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3252 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2904 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1515 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Georgia?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Georgia was 78.22 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 80.49 in 2009.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 60.43 in 2005.
- How does Georgia rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Georgia ranks 115th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 29.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.