Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Dominica
Dominica: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 78.13 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Dominica, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Dominica is 78.13, measured in 2014.
The figure is up 2.4% on the previous year and up 21.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Dominica peaked at 78.2 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 63.97, in 2006.
That places Dominica 116th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Dominica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 64.24 | — |
| 2006 | 63.97 | -0.4% |
| 2007 | 78.2 | +22.3% |
| 2008 | 76.68 | -2.0% |
| 2009 | 77.3 | +0.8% |
| 2010 | 76.81 | -0.6% |
| 2011 | 75.14 | -2.2% |
| 2012 | 76.02 | +1.2% |
| 2013 | 76.27 | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 78.13 | +2.4% |
Dominica compared with similar countries
- Dominica's 78.13 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 79.55, 98% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Dominica's 78.13 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 79.24, 99% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.08 | 63.97 | 78.2 | 5 |
| 2010s | 76.47 | 75.14 | 78.13 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Dominica
- 113 Sierra Leone 78.57 compare
- 114 Belize 78.49 compare
- 115 Georgia 78.22 compare
- 116 Equatorial Guinea 78.13 compare
- 116 Mozambique 78.13 compare
- 119 Maldives 77.95 compare
More reference data data for Dominica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0047 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0067 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0139 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0139 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0158 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0051 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0344 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0653 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0001 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Dominica?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Dominica was 78.13 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Dominica?
- The highest recorded value was 78.2 in 2007.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Dominica?
- The lowest recorded value was 63.97 in 2006.
- How does Dominica rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Dominica ranks 116th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Dominica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 21.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Dominica data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.