Equatorial Guinea vs Georgia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Equatorial Guinea
78.13
in 2014
Georgia
78.22
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
115th
Georgia rank
114th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Georgia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 78.22 against 78.13 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.09.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Georgia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 115th and Georgia ranks 114th of 181 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 57.36 72.33 14.97 Georgia
2010s 71.88 77.23 5.35 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Equatorial Guinea or Georgia?
Georgia, at 78.22 against 78.13 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Equatorial Guinea and Georgia?
0.09, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Georgia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Georgia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 115th and Georgia ranks 114th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.