Georgia vs Mozambique, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Georgia
78.22
in 2014
Mozambique, Republic of
78.13
in 2014
Georgia rank
115th
Mozambique, Republic of rank
116th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Georgia
- Mozambique, Republic of
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 78.22 against 78.13 in Mozambique, Republic of, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mozambique, Republic of ahead.
Georgia ranks 115th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 116th of 183 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Mozambique, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.33 | 69.36 | 2.97 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 77.23 | 75.39 | 1.85 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Georgia or Mozambique, Republic of?
- Georgia, at 78.22 against 78.13 in Mozambique, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Georgia and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 0.09, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Georgia and Mozambique, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Georgia ranks 115th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 116th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.