Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Cambodia
Cambodia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 90.03 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Cambodia, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Cambodia is 90.03, measured in 2014.
That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and up 5.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Cambodia peaked at 90.2 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 85.05, in 2005.
Cambodia ranks 46th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Cambodia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 85.05 | — |
| 2006 | 85.39 | +0.4% |
| 2007 | 86.33 | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 87.12 | +0.9% |
| 2009 | 89.24 | +2.4% |
| 2010 | 89.66 | +0.5% |
| 2011 | 90.17 | +0.6% |
| 2012 | 90.2 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 89.88 | -0.4% |
| 2014 | 90.03 | +0.2% |
Cambodia compared with similar countries
- Cambodia's 90.03 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 79.21, 1.1× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Cambodia's 90.03 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 92.87, 97% of the median. (27 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.62 | 85.05 | 89.24 | 5 |
| 2010s | 89.99 | 89.66 | 90.2 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cambodia
- 43 Philippines 90.29 compare
- 44 Cape Verde 90.12 compare
- 44 Portugal 90.12 compare
- 47 Morocco 89.32 compare
- 48 Netherlands 89.23 compare
- 49 Montenegro 89.05 compare
More reference data data for Cambodia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6712 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.8536 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8836 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 17.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.81 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Cambodia?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Cambodia was 90.03 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Cambodia?
- The highest recorded value was 90.2 in 2012.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Cambodia?
- The lowest recorded value was 85.05 in 2005.
- How does Cambodia rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Cambodia ranks 46th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Cambodia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Cambodia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.