Cambodia vs Montenegro: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Cambodia
90.03
in 2014
Montenegro
89.05
in 2014
Cambodia rank
46th
Montenegro rank
49th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Cambodia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 90.03 against 89.05 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.98.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 46th and Montenegro ranks 49th of 183 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.02 | 86.24 | 0.7824 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 89.99 | 88.65 | 1.34 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Cambodia or Montenegro?
- Cambodia, at 90.03 against 89.05 in Montenegro as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Cambodia and Montenegro?
- 0.98, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Montenegro?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Cambodia and Montenegro rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Cambodia ranks 46th and Montenegro ranks 49th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.