Cambodia vs Philippines: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Cambodia
90.03
in 2014
Philippines
90.29
in 2014
Cambodia rank
45th
Philippines rank
42nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Cambodia
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 90.29 against 90.03 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.26.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 45th and Philippines ranks 42nd of 181 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.62 | 88.03 | 1.4 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 89.99 | 92.74 | 2.76 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Cambodia or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 90.29 against 90.03 in Cambodia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Cambodia and Philippines?
- 0.26, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Philippines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cambodia and Philippines rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Cambodia ranks 45th and Philippines ranks 42nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.