Cabo Verde vs Cambodia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Cabo Verde
90.12
in 2014
Cambodia
90.03
in 2014
Cabo Verde rank
44th
Cambodia rank
46th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Cabo Verde
- Cambodia
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 90.12 against 90.03 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 44th and Cambodia ranks 46th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 1 and Cambodia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.22 | 86.62 | 0.5998 | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 88.73 | 89.99 | 1.26 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Cabo Verde or Cambodia?
- Cabo Verde, at 90.12 against 90.03 in Cambodia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Cabo Verde and Cambodia?
- 0.09, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Cambodia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cabo Verde and Cambodia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Cabo Verde ranks 44th and Cambodia ranks 46th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.