Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Morocco?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Morocco data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Morocco

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Morocco
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 83.37 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

83.37

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

109th

of 188 countries

All-time high

83.37

in 2014

All-time low

83.37

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Morocco, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Morocco is 83.37, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Morocco ranks 109th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Morocco

106 Kenya 83.57 compare
106 Laos 83.57 compare
106 East Timor 83.57 compare
110 Argentina 82.86 compare
110 Cambodia 82.86 compare
110 Kiribati 82.86 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Morocco

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 302.07 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 21.09 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4159 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.42 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 37.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 10,149 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 28.79 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 640.75 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.9 (2050)

All data for Morocco →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Morocco?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Morocco was 83.37 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Morocco?: The highest recorded value was 83.37 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Morocco?: The lowest recorded value was 83.37 in 2014.
How does Morocco rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Morocco ranks 109th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Morocco?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Morocco data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.