Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Kenya?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Kenya data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Kenya

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Kenya
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Kenya: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 83.57 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

83.57

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

106th

of 188 countries

All-time high

83.57

in 2014

All-time low

83.57

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Kenya, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Kenya recorded 83.57 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Kenya 106th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Kenya

103 Brazil 84.72 compare
104 Japan 84.71 compare
105 Benin 84.29 compare
106 Laos 83.57 compare
106 East Timor 83.57 compare
109 Morocco 83.37 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Kenya

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.55 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 33,242 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 47.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 15,384 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 292.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 477.91 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 52,910 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 1,433 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 67.66 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 543.91 (2050)

All data for Kenya →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Kenya?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Kenya was 83.57 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Kenya?: The highest recorded value was 83.57 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Kenya?: The lowest recorded value was 83.57 in 2014.
How does Kenya rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Kenya ranks 106th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Kenya?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kenya data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.