Lao People’s Democratic Republic vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
83.57
in 2019
Morocco
83.37
in 2019
Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank
108th
Morocco rank
111th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Lao People’s Democratic Republic
- Morocco
How they compare
Lao People’s Democratic Republic currently reports 83.57 against 83.37 in Morocco, a difference of 0.2.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lao People’s Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 108th and Morocco ranks 111th of 190 countries.
Lao People’s Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Lao People’s Democratic Republic or Morocco?
- Lao People’s Democratic Republic, at 83.57 against 83.37 in Morocco as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Morocco?
- 0.2, with Lao People’s Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Morocco?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Morocco rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 108th and Morocco ranks 111th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.