Morocco vs Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Morocco
83.37
in 2019
Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of
83.57
in 2019
Morocco rank
111th
Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of rank
108th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Morocco
- Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of
How they compare
Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of currently reports 83.57 against 83.37 in Morocco, a difference of 0.2.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Morocco ranks 111th and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of ranks 108th of 190 countries.
Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Morocco or Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of, at 83.57 against 83.37 in Morocco as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Morocco and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- 0.2, with Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Morocco and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Morocco ranks 111th and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of ranks 108th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.