Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Tanzania?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Tanzania data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Tanzania

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Tanzania
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 46.43 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

46.43

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

165th

of 188 countries

All-time high

46.43

in 2014

All-time low

46.43

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Tanzania, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Tanzania recorded 46.43 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Tanzania ranks 165th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Tanzania

162 Kuwait 52.6 compare
163 South Sudan 50 compare
164 Bangladesh 47.14 compare
166 Sierra Leone 44.69 compare
167 Algeria 42.89 compare
168 Mauritania 42.86 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Tanzania

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 68.48 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.44 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6405 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7582 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 72.45 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 59.37 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.26 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.13 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.2584 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 569.14 (2050)

All data for Tanzania →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Tanzania?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Tanzania was 46.43 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Tanzania?: The highest recorded value was 46.43 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Tanzania?: The lowest recorded value was 46.43 in 2014.
How does Tanzania rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Tanzania ranks 165th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Tanzania?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Tanzania data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.