Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Hong Kong, China

Hong Kong, China: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 91.89 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
91.89
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
56th
of 191 countries
All-time high
91.89
in 2014
All-time low
91.89
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Hong Kong, China, 2014–2019

0204060801002014201620192014: 91.92015: 91.92016: 91.92017: 91.92018: 91.92019: 91.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Hong Kong, China recorded 91.89 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Hong Kong, China 56th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Hong Kong, China, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Hong Kong, China, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 91.89
2015 91.89 +0.0%
2016 91.89 +0.0%
2017 91.89 +0.0%
2018 91.89 +0.0%
2019 91.89 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Hong Kong, China

  1. 55 Türkiye 92.14 compare
  2. 57 Fiji 91.79 compare
  3. 58 Libya 91.43 compare
  4. 58 Malaysia 91.43 compare
  5. 58 Montenegro 91.43 compare
  6. 58 Mozambique 91.43 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Hong Kong, China

All data for Hong Kong, China →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Hong Kong, China?
Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Hong Kong, China was 91.89 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Hong Kong, China?
The highest recorded value was 91.89 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Hong Kong, China?
The lowest recorded value was 91.89 in 2014.
How does Hong Kong, China rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 56th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in Hong Kong, China?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Hong Kong, China data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Hong Kong, China. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Hong Kong, China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.