Hong Kong, China vs Libya: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Hong Kong, China
91.89
in 2019
Libya
91.43
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
56th
Libya rank
58th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Libya
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 91.89 against 91.43 in Libya, a difference of 0.46.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 56th and Libya ranks 58th of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Hong Kong, China or Libya?
- Hong Kong, China, at 91.89 against 91.43 in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Hong Kong, China and Libya?
- 0.46, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Libya?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Libya rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 56th and Libya ranks 58th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.