Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Fiji?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Fiji data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Fiji

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Fiji
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Fiji: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 91.79 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

91.79

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

55th

of 188 countries

All-time high

91.79

in 2014

All-time low

91.79

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Fiji, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Fiji recorded 91.79 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Fiji 55th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Fiji

53 Turkey 92.14 compare
54 Hong Kong 91.89 compare
56 Libya 91.43 compare
56 Malaysia 91.43 compare
56 Montenegro 91.43 compare
56 Mozambique 91.43 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Fiji

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.307 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0683 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1992 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0009 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.307 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 382.55 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 60.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 38.02 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 428.11 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.8534 (2050)

All data for Fiji →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Fiji?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Fiji was 91.79 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Fiji?: The highest recorded value was 91.79 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Fiji?: The lowest recorded value was 91.79 in 2014.
How does Fiji rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Fiji ranks 55th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Fiji?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Fiji data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.