Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Malta

Malta: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 80.83 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
80.83
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
61st
of 191 countries
All-time high
80.83
in 2014
All-time low
80.83
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Malta, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 80.82015: 80.82016: 80.82017: 80.82018: 80.82019: 80.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Malta is 80.83, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Malta ranks 61st of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Malta, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Malta, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 80.83 —
2015 80.83 +0.0%
2016 80.83 +0.0%
2017 80.83 +0.0%
2018 80.83 +0.0%
2019 80.83 +0.0%

Malta compared with similar countries

  • Malta's 80.83 is below the median for high income countries, which is 81.25, 99% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Malta's 80.83 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 53.86, 1.5× the median. (23 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Malta

  1. 58 Tajikistan 81.39 compare
  2. 59 Laos 81.38 compare
  3. 60 Morocco 80.99 compare
  4. 62 Thailand 80.62 compare
  5. 63 Cambodia 80 compare
  6. 64 China 79.9 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Malta

All data for Malta →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Malta?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Malta was 80.83 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Malta?
The highest recorded value was 80.83 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Malta?
The lowest recorded value was 80.83 in 2014.
How does Malta rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Malta ranks 61st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Malta?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Malta data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Malta. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/malta/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Malta</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.