Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Laos?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Laos data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Laos

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Laos
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Laos: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 81.38 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

81.38

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

57th

of 188 countries

All-time high

81.38

in 2014

All-time low

81.38

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Laos, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Laos recorded 81.38 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Laos 57th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Laos

54 Malaysia 82.29 compare
55 Singapore 81.67 compare
56 Tajikistan 81.39 compare
58 Morocco 80.99 compare
59 Malta 80.83 compare
60 Thailand 80.62 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Laos

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.913 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.88 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3021 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6615 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.88 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 587.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 7,569 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 63.43 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 1,343 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 1,049 (2050)

All data for Laos →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Laos?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Laos was 81.38 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Laos?: The highest recorded value was 81.38 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Laos?: The lowest recorded value was 81.38 in 2014.
How does Laos rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Laos ranks 57th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Laos?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Laos data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.