Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Morocco?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Morocco data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Morocco

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Morocco
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 80.99 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

80.99

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

58th

of 188 countries

All-time high

80.99

in 2014

All-time low

80.99

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Morocco, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Morocco recorded 80.99 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Morocco ranks 58th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Morocco

55 Singapore 81.67 compare
56 Tajikistan 81.39 compare
57 Laos 81.38 compare
59 Malta 80.83 compare
60 Thailand 80.62 compare
61 Cambodia 80 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Morocco

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 302.07 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 21.09 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4159 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.42 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 37.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 10,149 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 28.79 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 640.75 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.9 (2050)

All data for Morocco →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Morocco?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Morocco was 80.99 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Morocco?: The highest recorded value was 80.99 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Morocco?: The lowest recorded value was 80.99 in 2014.
How does Morocco rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Morocco ranks 58th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Morocco?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Morocco data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.